ISSUES AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL MUTATIONS IN THE ECONOMIC FIELD

» TABLE OF CONTENTS
» SEE ARCHIVE

By: Angelica-Nicoleta ONEA
JEL: A14, B49, B59
Keywords: praxeology, economics, human action, causality, teleology

Knowledge in economics, as well as in other fields included in social sciences, can
not be achieved upon the Galilean model, so customary in natural sciences. In time, its
transfer conducted to the finding of some inconsistencies at the level of theory or between
theory and practice. The subject-object discernibility, a possible simplification in natural
science, becomes problematically in social sciences, where this delimitation operates only in
theory, and, actually, the effects of the whole "package" are registered in. Also, the
repeatability of initial conditions, possible in natural sciences through the control of the
variables, becomes inoperative within social sciences that can not recreate the original
context. All these lead to the idea that explanatory models and theories based on the causaltype
determinism do not provide satisfactory answers. That is why the Aristotelian tradition is
brought into attention, emphasizing the determinism of intelligibility type.